A pint for Dionysus

January 30, 2013

Glass Experiment: Mirror Pond

Filed under: glassware project — Tags: , — grotusque @ 1:52 pm

The first ale I chose for the glass experiment was Deschutes’ Mirror Pond. I picked this ale for two reasons: I like it and I know how it tastes. I hoped that this would give me a solid baseline: since I know what Mirror Pond is supposed to taste like, I would have a better sense of how it was affected, if at all.

Here’s what we noticed: Nose was nice in schooner but there was less nose, in the pint glass.

I noticed more malt flavors in the mug and the brandy glass not much nose, at all, initially. I wondered if a short pour as effecting the experience: as you can see from the photo, the brandy glass has the least head on it of the four.

My girlfriend caught more scents than I did but said the flavors was largely unaffected. She didn’t like the weightiness of the mug–which I tried to suggest wasn’t really what we were testing for but upon discussion I had to admitĀ was part of the experience. She got more nose in brandy glass than I did, which I was surprised at because there was no foam on top. The pint glass had and kept foam best, with the mug a second, yet the schooner offered more scent than the mug did.

We agreed that these differences in Mirror Pond were subtle. Very, very subtle. We made a mistake by pouring all four beers at once, which caused us to hurry through each of them at first, trying to get scents, and then work our way through the rest of the experience slower. It made picking differences out more challenging but I will point out that because each beer was the same, plucking differences out should be difficult. Regardless of the challenge, in the future we’ll have all the beers on the same evening but two at a time so we don’t have to rush.

As we drank, I got much more nose from brandy glass-too much. By the end of the floral notes were almost sickening to me. That was a very, very confusing moment because no other glass provided this experience. Also the mug kept the beer coldest out of the glasses. We proposed that it might be better for lagers.

She liked the lager glass then the pint glass, the brandy glass then the mug. I went pint, lager, mug, brandy.

Conclusions: this won’t make a bad beer better, nor a good beer excellent but each glass does push some style points of this beer further than others.

So the first thing to say here is: I was wrong. The glassware does have an impact. I am genuinely surprised by this. I still believe that most people can be forgiven for not caring about the glass much and I don’t think that people should become snooty about their glassware because those differences were small, gentle ones and not really enough to change lead into gold. I feel that a wonderful beer will show its true colors in any container.

But the glass could brighten (or dull) a beer in a few tiny ways that could affect a patron’s enjoyment and sometimes those little changes make all the difference.

About these ads

10 Comments »

  1. It’s being able to notice the small gentle differences that makes people snooty. I have a better nose – pallet – whatever -than you!

    Comment by Ron — January 30, 2013 @ 6:43 pm

    • I hope not: skill should be appreciated and shared not a tool to lord over others.

      Comment by grotusque — January 31, 2013 @ 8:41 am

  2. I am surprised the snifter had the least nose. Isn’t that the point of the snifter, even with only that much in the glass?

    Comment by Helper Monkey Brews — January 30, 2013 @ 7:43 pm

    • I was too! But something about the shape kept foam from forming, as though it was some kind of anti-carbonation. Although late in the drink, the nose was overwhelming–so I really don’t know what to make of it. Hopefully further testing will reveal something.

      Comment by grotusque — January 31, 2013 @ 8:44 am

  3. Interesting results on the snifter. Not surprised by the pint glass. The mug has its place…heavy or not.

    Comment by Brian — January 30, 2013 @ 9:19 pm

    • I like having the mug in there too! The broad array of glasses helps give some proper variance and helps give me some legitimacy to the experiment.

      Comment by grotusque — January 31, 2013 @ 8:51 am

  4. If I’m drinking something that’s “Belgian-y” (yeast, style), I try to put it into things like snifters. The same with really potent beers, but that’s more about portion control.

    Otherwise, I don’t tend to care all that much. I know the shape of the glass has an effect on the beer, but I can’t be bothered to collected a ton of glassware whose individual pieces will find very little use.

    Comment by bottlebybottle — January 31, 2013 @ 3:13 pm

    • There’s some truth here: I have too damn many pint glasses and I really don’t need any more. But this is what people like to give away to beer drinkers, not quite getting that we have closets full of ‘em.

      Still: so far the test is showing that the glass does make a difference, albeit a small one.

      Comment by grotusque — February 1, 2013 @ 10:09 am

  5. [...] this experiment, I took the lessons from the previous one and only poured two glasses at a time. This let us slow down and appreciate what was going on, [...]

    Pingback by Glass Experiment: Old Rasputin « A pint for Dionysus — February 15, 2013 @ 11:34 am


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

The Silver is the New Black Theme Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 59 other followers

%d bloggers like this: